Giving Space Santa Fe Trip Report

December, 26-29, 2001

Harold Koenig

 

Tom Munnecke, Harold Koenig,[photo] David Ellerman and Jay Hauser [photo] traveled to Santa Fe for three days of discussion and meetings concerning the emerging transformational concepts of Giving Space.

December 26, 2001

Discussions between Munnecke, Koenig, Ellerman and Hauser.

Trust develops when the following converge:  Identification Reputation & Accountability

The following questions emerged:

How can chains of trust be established? 

Is trust scalable?

General convergence on the notion of Helpers-> trust chain -> Doers

 

December 27, 2001

All met with Stu Kaufman in his BIOS office [photo].  Introduced the concept of Giving Space.  Had a general discussion about the problems present in development and relief, how to transform giving.  He mentioned that the fitness function which would drive the evolution of the space was an extremely critical issue.  The group discussed notions of appreciative inquiry and “benegnosis” – a way of understanding based on the positive.  Stu was interested enough to invite the group back the next day for further discussions. 

December 28, 2001

Meeting with Murray Gell-Mann of the Santa Fe Institute. [photo]

Concept of Giving Space introduced to Dr. Gell-Mann.  Discussion point included the problems in philanthropy, especially the need to be able to trust the process.  Discussion included concept of scalability across continents, regions, nations, states/provinces, communities, cities/villages/rural areas, tribes, families, individuals.  Also:  Populations, environment, animals, plants biosphere.  Question raised: are there intrinsics that cut across the scale of all of these?  [Photo of Munnecke and Gell-Mann]

The perversities in development and relief that are beginning to be recognized were discussed.  The need for development and relief to build on innate resiliency rather than just providing funds was emphasized.  Failure to work with innate resiliency creates a “victimization loop” much like the welfare state, where people learn they can profit from suffering from “victim hood.”  We need to be working to break and eliminate this “loop.”  The book, The Road to Hell by Michael Maran is a good reference source for more information on this. The transformation that Giving Space promotes should be scalable, self-propagating, auto catalytic and trust raising. [photo of Ellerman and Gell-Mann]

Dr. Gell-Man is interested in the SFI sponsoring a meeting with Giving Space, tentatively in Spring, 2002 to open the concept to a wider audience.  Others who might be included were the McArthur Foundation, The World Bank and the Ford Foundation.

Follow-up meeting with Dr. Stuart Kaufman.

Much the same conversation and discussion was held with Dr. Kaufman that was held earlier with Dr Gell-Man.  Dr. Kaufman.  Dr Kaufman asked each of us, “How do you plan to operate.”  In turn, each of us provided our thoughts to him, and each other, about this. He noted that each of our descriptions were different…

Dr. Kaufman joked that what we needed to be doing was to “make the pie higher.”  There is a window of opportunity in the wake of September 11th for us to make Giving Space meaningful.  He said, “We need to find the leverage points.”  “We need to transform development/relief into a web of mutually supportive cottage industries that could become exponentially more powerful that they are today as stand-alone organizations.”  Giving Space needs to be able to continuously determine what organizations provide the most bang for the buck.  We need top determine the Tipping Points in Philanthropy as well as the Sink Holes and where do they matter

Dr. Kaufman also volunteered to join the Giving Space board, and was given the honorable title of Chief Autocatalytic Officer. 

Evening at Suzanne Dulle’s home

            The group was invited to the home of Suzanne Dulle.  Until recently, she was Director of Business Relations and External affairs at the Santa Fe Institute.  Her husband, Juan, was born in Bolivia and has many relatives in the International development area. [photo of Juan, Suzanne, Jan] During the course of a wonderful evening’s discussion, Suzanne volunteered to help organize a meeting in Santa Fe with GivingSpace and Santa Fe Institute.

 

Tom Munnecke’s General Topics for Santa Fe Dec 27-28, 2001

            Is it possible to apply “Santa Fe” thinking in conjunction with global connectivity to create self-organizing, self-propagating spaces (instead of “systems”) which address positive social transformation in complex areas such as philanthropy, international development, environmental sustainability, and health?

 

  • Autocatalytic Space: A space in which void expands as stuff is added. (e.g. web got bigger when Amazon.com came online, cosmos gains energy as it expands, biospace grows with new ecological niches with each new species.)  Can we create an autocatalytic space for positive transformational activities such as philanthropy (GivingSpace) and health (HealthSpace), and other complex global issues?  If so, what are the simplest initial conditions, constraints, and transformational energies to catalyze such spaces?
  • Transformational systems.  Rather than try to understand a system by aggregating transactions according to linear accounting schemes, can we understand the flow of complex interactions as transformations? Can we use bidirectional communications within an autocatalytic space to create a fitness landscape in which that which is most transformational thrives and replicates, creating a cascade of transformation  at many scales simultaneously?
  • Malgnosis is way of knowing based on what is wrong with a system (Martians pulling tubes out of TV to understand how it fails; current allopathic health care system)
  • Benegnosis is way of knowing based on what is right with system (Martians understanding circuit diagrams for TV; having a language of health for medicine; will genomic medicine be driven by malgnostic or benegnostic understanding?)
  • Intrinsics are scale-independent properties, “slicing” along a continuum of characteristic scales.  For example, characteristic scales of health include gene, cell, organ, systemic, person, family, community, nation, species.  Some intrinsics may be vitality, identity, violence, self-ordering. 
  • Cascades are the effects of intrinsics operating in a space, across many different characteristic scales.  Scientific method and notions of causality “slice” characteristic scales to that which can be proven (i.e, “causality” objectively show); often by ignoring the paradoxes of self reference.  Cascades allow self reference, and acknowledge that notions of causality may not be feasible concept when dealing with polyscalar transformation.  Can we create initial conditions and constraints which give us confidence that cascades will be bengnostic?
  • Complementary Currency.  Is it possible to create complementary currencies which drive cascades, network effects, and increasing returns for positive social transformation? (“Frequent flier” program for philanthropy?)
  • Self Organizing Trust Systems.  What is necessary for a self-organizing trust mechanism which would be usable in autocatalytic spaces to allow trust and community to grow and create additional transformational activity?